- Status Assigned
- Percent Complete
- Task Type Bug Report
- Category Parser
-
Assigned To
Torsten Bonde Christiansen - Operating System All
- Severity High
- Priority High
- Reported Version 1.3.2
- Due in Version Undecided
-
Due Date
Undecided
- Votes
- Private
Attached to Project: Analysis
Opened by Jens Lauritsen - 28.01.2019
Last edited by Jens Lauritsen - 28.01.2019
Opened by Jens Lauritsen - 28.01.2019
Last edited by Jens Lauritsen - 28.01.2019
FS#190 - Value label: Incorrect handling of in-existing values in modification
Two aspects of modifications of value labels are not handled in a user oriented manner.
1 change to "not found": // value label should be forgiving if deleting a value is not found, just like "drop v " .
for S in ["alvorliglbl", "fvgl","janej","henvislbl","koenlbl","plbl"] do
edit vl @{s} !d:=1410065407;
ERROR: Cannot delete - value does not exist!
2 change to "Cannot Assign Missing to undefined Value in: xxxx (here alderlbl)"
// Assigning missing to an undefined value is not handled correctly
edit vl alderlbl !m:=9;
ERROR: Unhandled error during execution:
Access violation
Please contact EpiData (info@epidata.dk) and include a copy of history and if possible example data!